Monday, January 31, 2011

Tuesday 1 February 2011 Public Service Project


It is important that every member of your group be thoroughly familiar with organization you have chosen. Hence:

Due at the end of class from each member of your group: 200 words that explain the history of your organization, its purpose / objectives and why this is an organization you care to support.

Take a bit of time to do some research, if you have not yet done so.
Start thinking about dividing up your work.
1. the public service announcement (who is editing?)
2. the speaker? who can best deliver the content? Are you filming or doing this live?
3. Who is designing / making the products? or brochure? or poster? These should be as close to professional looking as possible.
4. Events budget. You need some activity to raise awareness of your organization. Be realistic and imaginative. (Really that is not a paradox.) How much is this going to cost? advertising? space rental? caterers? speaker? Activities? Who might donate? What are you charging? How many volunteers do you need to make this successful?
5. You need a contact list. Who specifically liaises for this organization within our community?

Sunday, January 23, 2011

Monday 24 January Public Relations Project



Journalism
Public Relations Project
Take your time to read the following, before asking questions. What is key today is to put together your group and give me the name of your organization. There should be no duplicates within a class. Post your group and selection on the blog.
What is Public Relations?
It seems difficult to believe at the dawn of the 21st Century, that there exists a major discipline with so many diverse, partial, incomplete and limited interpretations of its mission. Here, just a sampling of professional opinion on what public relations is all about:

1. talking to the media on behalf of a client.
2. selling a product, service or idea.
3. reputation management.
4. engineering of perception
5. attracting credit to an organization for doing good.
6. limiting the downside when it does bad.

By definition, public relations is the art and science of establishing relationships between an organization and its key audiences. Public relations plays a key role in helping business industries create strong relationships with customers.


There are different types of public relations, some companies call it investor relations and yet others will call it financial public relations, but what companies do not realize is the fact that public relations is an extremely essential and integral marketing tool.

Basically, the general idea of public relations is advertising, branding and marketing. Anything that involves the media is the responsibility of the public relations officer. He encourages magazines, newspapers, radio and TV to print or air good things about the services and the products. This promotion will reach their targeted customers therefore generating an increase on sales and patronage.

People act on their perception of the facts; those perceptions lead to certain behaviors; and something can be done about those perceptions and behaviors that leads to achieving an organization’s objectives.

That leads us directly to the core strength of public relations.

When public relations creates, changes or reinforces the general opinion by reaching, persuading and moving-to-desired-action those people whose behaviors affect the organization, the public relations mission is accomplished.


Public Relations, Marketing and Advertising ?

You will often find that many people confuse public relations with marketing and/or advertising or vice versa. The most apparent reason for this is that the clear-cut distinctions are disappearing as each strategy’s different awareness building efforts become more and more integrated. While all those components are important they are very different.
Please take a look at the image at the top to note the differences.

Project Mechanics- Presentations are Monday 7 February. Details to follow.
In groups of 2 to 4 of you will work together to produce a Public Relations package for a non-profit organization of local or national importance (ex. SADD). Your group is responsible for the following:

1. A 1:30 Public Service Announcement (PSA).
2. A press release publicizing a related event
3. Two of the following: posters, brochures, t-shirt or print ads or something else imaginative.
4. A detailed event budget, including advertising fees
5. List of contacts for the events

Today: I need the names of the people in your group and the organization for which you are putting together your project.

Please familiarize yourself with the content overview, key concepts and key terms.
Note the examples of a new or press release and the sample public relations campaign.
Below is a list of non-profits. It is by no means all-inclusive; so if you have something else in mind, let me know; otherwise, choose from the list.

Advocacy Groups for Human Rights and Civil Liberties
•American Civil Liberties Union
•Americans United for Separation of Church and State
•Amnesty International
•Anti-Defamation League
•Association on American Indian Affairs
•B'nai B'rith International
•Children's Defense Fund
•Coalition to Stop Gun Violence
•The Carter Center
•Center for Constitutional Rights
•Committee for Missing Children
•Doctors of the World
•Human Rights Watch
•NAACP
Animal Rights
Become an ASPCA Volunteer •African Wildlife Foundation
•American Humane Association
•American Association for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
•Animal Legal Defense Fund
•Animal Welfare Institute
•Associated Humane Societies
•Best Friends Animal Society
•Born Free United with Animal Protection Institute
•Defenders of Wildlife
•Doris Day Animal League
•D.E.L.T.A. Rescue
•Delta Society
•The Elephant Sanctuary in Tennessee
•Farm Sanctuary
•Humane Farming Association
•Marine Mammal Center
•National Audobon Society
Land Conservation and the Environment
•American Farmland Trust
•American Forests
•American Rivers
•Center for Biological Diversity
•Chesapeake Bay Foundation
•Cousteau Society
•Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International
•Earth Island Institute
•Earth Justice
•Environmental Defense Fund
•Farm Aid
•Greenpeace
•Keep America Beautiful
•National Parks Foundation
•Ocean Conservancy
•Wildlife Conservation Society
General Emergency Relief
•American Jewish World Services
•American Red Cross
•See Also: Red Cross USA, Facts About American Red Cross, and Red Cross History
•Fire Fighters' Charity
Refugees
•American Near East Refugee Aid
•American Refugee Committee
Medical Assistance
•Americares
•Catholic Medical Missions Board
•Direct Relief International
•Doctors without Borders
•International Medical Corps
•Medical Teams International
•Operation Smile
Education, Research and Cultural Preservation Groups
•Africa America Institute
•AFS USA
•American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research
•American Indian College Fund
•Asia Society
•Education Fund to Stop Gun Violence
•Hispanic Scholarship Fund
•Scholarship America
Health: Research, and Education
•American Stroke Association
•Arthritis Research Institute
•Avon Foundation
•City of Hope/Beckman Research Institute
•Epilepsy Foundation and Research
•AIDS Research Alliance
•ALS Association
•American Diabetes Association
•Autism Speaks
•Deafness Research Foundation
•Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation
•Lupus Research Institute
•National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
•First Candle
Support for Chronic Illnesses and Diseases
•Alzheimer's Association
•Kidney Fund
•American Leprosy Mission
•American Liver Foundation
•American Lung Association
•American Parkinson's Disease Association
•Arthritis Foundation
•Bailey House
•Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
•Easter Seals
•Huntington's Disease Society of America
•Multiple Sclerosis Foundation
•National Association for the Terminally Ill
Cancer Support and Research
•American Cancer Society
•Cancer Care
•Cancer Center for Protection and Prevention
•Cancer Federation
•Cancer Fund of America
•Cancer Recovery Foundation
•Cancer Research Institute
•St Jude's Children's Research Hospital
•American Breast Cancer Foundation
•Childhood Leukemia Foundation
•National Children's Cancer Society
•Children's Cancer Research Institute
•Jimmy Fund
•Lance Armstrong Foundation
Support for Physical and Cognitive Disabilities
•American Action Fund for Blind Children and Adults
•American Association of the Deaf-Blind
•American Foundation for Disabled Children
•Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation
•Guide Dogs of America
•Heritage for the Blind
List of Nonprofit Organizations That Deal with Poverty
Catholic Charities
•Catholic Relief Services
•Christian Appalachia Project
•Christian Relief Services
•Coalition for the Homeless
•Lutheran World Relief
Feeding the Hungry
•Action Against Hunger
•Africare
•Bread for the World
•Care
•City Harvest
•Feed My People
•Food Bank for New York City
Promoting Self Sufficiency
Top Charities •Accion International
•National Relief Charities
•Bowery Residents' Committee
•Brother's Brother Foundation
•Center for Community Change
•FINCA International
•Food for the Hungry
•Habitat for Humanity
•Heifer Project International
Impoverished Children
•World Villages for Children
•Children International
•Christian Children's Fund
•Compassion International
•Covenant House
Sanctity of Life
•American Life League
Senior Citizens
•AARP Foundation
•American Health Assistance Foundation
•Seniors' Coalition
Supporting Military and Veterans
•Adopt a Platoon
•Air Force Aid Society
•Armed Forces Aid Campaign
•Armed Services YMCA
•Army Emergency Relief
•Blinded Veterans Assocation
•Paralyzed Veterans of America
Supporting Fire Fighters and Police
•American Association of State Troopers
•American Federation of Police and Concerned Citizens
•Association for Firefighters and Paramedics
•Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund
Watchdog Groups
•Accuracy in Media
•Citizens Against Government Waste
•Common Cause
•Judicial Watch
•Media Research
Children and Youth
Donate Toys to Needy •Big Brothers Big Sisters of America
•Boy Scouts of America
•Boys and Girls Club of America
•Campfire USA
•Cedars Homes for Children
•Child Find of America
•Child Welfare League of America
•Girl Scouts
•Junior Achievement
•National 4-H Council
•SADD
Women
•Catalyst
•Family Care International
•Global Fund for Women
•International Planned Parenthood
•League of Women Voters
•National Organization for Women

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Wednesday 19 January

Reminders: Please post all your enviromental responses on yesterdays blog.
Friday is your midterm. Once again it will consist of questions pulled directly from the three news grammar handouts. You simply need to review the correct responses, the idea being that you will understand the grammar behind them.

Saturday, January 15, 2011

Tuesday 11 January 3rd blog



Blog 3: The Environment. Read the article below. Since this is so extensive, let's divide the writing up.
Choose two topics and write a minimum of 100 words for each. Then respond to two other people for each. By Thursday, you should have a total of six responses posted.

Remember Friday is your in-class midterm. If you anticipate being out, make sure you take this before hand.
Edward Flattau.Environmental newspaper columnist
Posted: January 13, 2011 .Environmental Futurecast: Six Pressing Environmental Challenges
The foremost environmental issues in the coming year revolve around air pollution, especially the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions that serve as a catalyst for global warming. But what about the longer view? What are the most pressing environmental challenges facing humanity for the duration of the 21st Century?

There are six that made my list.

Climate Change: This category includes the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel burning in stationary and mobile sources. The objective is to slow and eventually stabilize global warming, thereby mitigating drastic climate fluctuations and rising sea levels that would cause havoc. Success in controlling the increase of carbon dioxide concentrations and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere would also help to curb the acidification of the oceans and destruction of coral reefs.

Energy Transition: This is closely related to climate change and involves gradually replacing polluting finite fossil fuels (like coal and oil) with clean renewable energy such as solar, wind , biomass, and if scientists can ever figure it out, nuclear fusion. Transportation is a subheading here, as we try to shift automobiles (and other modes of travel) away from dependency on oil to a reliance on cleaner natural gas, hydrogen, and in the distant future, perhaps solar power.

Family Planning: This relates to stabilizing the human population through education, contraception, and spacing of births that history shows lead to smaller family size. The idea is to avert population exceeding the capacity of the planet's natural resource base to provide us with an adequate food supply.

Land Use Planning: Under this category, I would include preservation of the earth's remaining biodiversity, wetlands, and prime agricultural acreage. Restoration of degraded natural resources, where possible, would be an important subheading. So would creating livable cities by providing potable water, sustainable clean energy delivery systems, adequate housing, and ample open green space while eliminating sprawl.

Reducing Global Poverty: This scourge jeopardizes a healthy sustainable relationship between human beings and the earth's biological life support system on which we all depend. Desperation is the enemy of conservation. Poverty can be effectively combated through universal education (that leads to societal stability), technology transfer from developed to developing countries, and a modest redistribution of wealth through foreign aid that is structured as a hand up, not a handout.

Preventing the introduction and reducing the presence of industrial produced toxic chemicals in the environment: Effective regulation, technological innovation that provides benign substitutes to toxic chemicals, and rigorous enforcement play pivotal roles in cleansing a global environment plagued by widespread manmade pollution.

I think that just about covers it.

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Thursday January 13 2nd blog write


Some folks had trouble posting on their responses on the blog. You can either set up a new gmail account or send them as an attachment today. No credit will be given after today.

Below is an editorial relating to open adoptions. Read and respond as before: get your first one up today and the next two tomorrow.

A Civil Right: Adoptees Should Have Access to Their Birth Certificates
What's Your ReactionAt the beginning of the 1900s, grim predictions punctuated the debate over women's suffrage. Everyone in the family unit would be damaged in innumerable ways if this outrage were allowed to happen, argued the critics, some of whom went so far as to predict the end of civilization itself.

Half a century later, another historic social change was in the offing, and the warnings of impending disaster were at least as dire. Indeed, some opponents of the movement to extend civil rights to people of color in our country were so sure that personal and social ruin were lurking around the corner that they fought with filibusters, nooses and guns to maintain the status quo.

Forecasting the future evidently is a difficult thing to do. Looking back is obviously easier, and it leads to two unambiguous conclusions. First, whether the effort is to give women the vote, provide African-Americans with equal rights, create access for people with disabilities -- or level the playing field for any other discriminated-against segment of the population -- there will be nay-sayers who insist that horrible things will occur if the sought-after change is allowed to transpire. Second, they will be wrong.

No, this is not a commentary about "don't ask, don't tell" or any other gay rights issue, though the identical observations would certainly apply. Rather, it's about providing legal and moral equality for a segment of our population that is not generally perceived as deprived of any rights: the approximately 7 million Americans who were adopted into their families. And the right denied to most of them is so basic that it almost sounds like a joke: access to their own original birth certificates.

There are lots of reasons that adopted people want the same documents, containing the same information, that the rest of us take for granted. Some have medical motives, including individuals who need a matching organ or information about an inherited disease; others want to know about their heritage or genealogy (anyone remember Alex Haley?) or why their eyes are green or what their original names were; and many yearn to see the faces of the women and men who gave them life.

At the bottom line, however, those are not the reasons it should matter to everyone that adopted people, on reaching the age of majority, cannot automatically obtain their own original birth certificates like the rest of us. We should care, and we should feel outraged, for the same reason so many men supported suffrage for women and so many white Americans joined the civil rights struggle -- because we should find it offensive when any minority group in society is deprived of equal rights.

Here's where the nay-sayers come in. Honest-to-goodness, the following are among the consequences they say will occur if state legislatures give adult adoptees the right to access their original birth certificates: The number of adoptions in our country will fall, the number of abortions will rise, the lives of women who were promised lifelong anonymity when they placed their children for adoption will be ruined and, yes, adoption itself will be in peril.
Research in the field, including by the independent, nonpartisan think tank that I head, refutes or calls into serious question every one of those claims; here you can read the latest report on the subject.

Equally important, this is not a guessing game or a social experiment. During the last decade, more than a half-dozen very diverse states in terms of geography and politics -- from Oregon to Alabama to Maine -- have done what the nay-sayers warned them not to do, and two states -- Alaska and Kansas -- never sealed these documents, as most of the nation did in the last century. Guess what calamitous fallout there has been in these states.

None.

Will some people face difficult or unexpected situations, or even get hurt, as a result of extending this right from coast to coast? Almost certainly, but we know from research, experience and official statistics (in the above states) that the numbers of those adversely affected will be tiny -- and we should do all we can for them by taking steps such as providing public notice, offering counseling, and giving women who placed their children for adoption the ability to officially declare if they do not want to be contacted.

Is this issue as important as women's rights or civil rights or disability rights or gay rights? Maybe or maybe not, but it's not a contest to see which group should get rights and which should not. Besides, this much is certain: Every additional day, month and year that original birth certificates remain sealed, some more adoptees and birth parents who want or need to find each other will give up instead, and some more will die, without ever filling the hole in their hearts.

So it sure does feel important to the people who are deprived. And if we understand that it's about equality and social justice for another group of Americans -- 7 million of them -- maybe we'll feel it, too.

Adam Pertman is Executive Director of the Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute and author of "Adoption Nation: How the Adoption Revolution is Transforming Our Families - and America," which is scheduled for release in April and has been reviewed as "the most important book ever published on the subject."

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Wednesday 12 January

Warm thoughts to you folks.
Today is the last day to respond to the Gabrielle Gifford story that was posted on Monday. To reiterate:
1. You must have 100 words for your original response for a writing grade of 100 points.
2. You must have two additional responses to two other students for an additional writing grade of 100 points.
Please post these on today's blog- not yesterdays. I've already put in yesterday's postings.

TODAY IS THE LAST DAY TO POST THESE THREE ITEMS! We are moving on tomorrow.

Saturday, January 8, 2011

Monday 10 January: blogging

NOTE: The next two days there is a sub, as I am protoring and grading the 11th grade ELA. If you have questions / concerns (want to chat?), I will be in the building. The office will know where to find me. I'll also be checking and updating the blog.
New ASSIGNMENT: Blogging There is a lot of information. Please take the time and read.

The following is from WordPress.org

"Blog" is an abbreviated version of "weblog," which is a term used to describe web sites that maintain an ongoing chronicle of information. A blog features diary-type commentary and links to articles on other Web sites, usually presented as a list of entries in reverse chronological order. Blogs range from the personal to the political, and can focus on one narrow subject or a whole range of subjects.


We have two weeks left in this term and will spend it blogging. What this will entail is that every couple of days, you will have an article prompt to which you will respond. These responses should be subjective, much as one would write an editorial; however, they should not be diatribes, but insightful, reflective observations. At the same time, again like an editorial, there will be some controversy. Not everyone will have the same reaction.

Mechanics:
1. Read the article.

3. Respond and post your postion / obsevation / reflection. (You might want to check your information.)

4, Now read some of your classmates' responses and respond to at least two of these. Again, these are not attacks, but thoughtful reflections and observations. Again, you may want to do a little background reading to support your position.

I also want you to become familiar with some newsblogs. To begin The Huffington Post (often referred to on the Internet as HuffPo) is a politically-progressive online news website and aggregated weblog founded by Arianna Huffington and Kenneth Lerer, featuring hyperlinks to various news sources and columnists. The Huffington Post was launched on May 9, 2005 as a news and commentary outlet. Its roster of bloggers includes many people from Arianna Huffington's extensive network of prominent friends. As of August 8, 2006 it was the 5th most popular weblog overall as measured by web links. Read the first article on this weekend's attempted assassination (correct term) in Arizona. Then take a look at a couple of Huffington Post's blog resposes.



Gabrielle Giffords Shot: Congresswoman Shot In Arizona
The Huffington Post/AP First Posted: 01- 8-11 01:14 PM Updated: 01- 9-11 03:17 AM

The assassination attempt left Giffords in critical condition -- the bullet went straight through her brain -- but the hospital said her outlook was "optimistic" and that she was responding to commands from doctors. The hospital said a 9-year-old child was among the killed, and a U.S. Marshal said a federal judge was also fatally shot in the attack.

Giffords spokesman C.J. Karamargin said three Giffords staffers were shot in the attack. One died, and the other two are expected to survive. Gabe Zimmerman, a former social worker who served as Giffords' director of community outreach, died.

Giffords, 40, is a moderate Democrat who narrowly won re-election in November against a tea party candidate who sought to throw her from office over her support of the health care law. Anger over her position became violent at times, with her Tucson office vandalized after the House passed the overhaul last March and someone showing up at a recent gathering with a weapon.

Police say the shooter was in custody, and was identified by people familiar with the investigation as Jared Lee Loughner, 22. U.S. officials who provided his name to the AP spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to release it publicly.

It's still not clear if Loughner had the health care debate in mind or was focused on his own unique set of political beliefs, many outlined in rambling videos and postings on the Internet.

Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik described the gunman as mentally unstable and possibly acting with an accomplice. He said Giffords was among 13 people wounded in the melee that killed six people, including a 9-year-old girl, an aide for the Democratic lawmaker and U.S. District Judge John Roll, who had just stopped by to see his friend Giffords after celebrating Mass. Dupnik said the rampage ended only after two people tackled the gunman.

The sheriff blamed the vitriolic political rhetoric that has consumed the country, much of it centered in Arizona.

"When you look at unbalanced people, how they respond to the vitriol that comes out of certain mouths about tearing down the government. The anger, the hatred, the bigotry that goes on in this country is getting to be outrageous," he said. "And unfortunately, Arizona, I think, has become the capital. We have become the mecca for prejudice and bigotry."

Giffords expressed similar concern, even before the shooting. In an interview after her office was vandalized, she referred to the animosity against her by conservatives, including Sarah Palin's decision to list Giffords' seat as one of the top "targets" in the midterm elections.

"For example, we're on Sarah Palin's targeted list, but the thing is, that the way that she has it depicted has the crosshairs of a gun sight over our district. When people do that, they have to realize that there are consequences to that action," Giffords said in an interview with MSNBC.

In the hours after the shooting, Palin issued a statement in which she expressed her "sincere condolences" to the family of Giffords and the other victims.

During his campaign effort to unseat Giffords in November, Republican challenger Jesse Kelly held fundraisers where he urged supporters to help remove Giffords from office by joining him to shoot a fully loaded M-16 rifle. Kelly is a former Marine who served in Iraq and was pictured on his website in military gear holding his automatic weapon and promoting the event.

"I don't see the connection," between the fundraisers featuring weapons and Saturday's shooting, said John Ellinwood, Kelly's spokesman. "I don't know this person, we cannot find any records that he was associated with the campaign in any way. I just don't see the connection.

"Arizona is a state where people are firearms owners - this was just a deranged individual."

Law enforcement officials said members of Congress reported 42 cases of threats or violence in the first three months of 2010, nearly three times the 15 cases reported during the same period a year earlier. Nearly all dealt with the health care bill, and Giffords was among the targets.

A 19-year-old volunteer at the event, Alex Villec, described how the violence unfolded.

Villec, a former staffer for the congresswoman, told The Associated Press that the man who later turned out to be the suspect arrived at the event wearing a black cap and baggy pants and asking for the congresswoman.

"I told him ... she'll be more than happy to talk to you as your turn comes," Villec said. The man walked away, but returned just minutes later and burst through a table separating Villec and Giffords from the public. Villec said he saw him raise an arm, and then he heard gunfire.

The gunman fired at Giffords and her district director and started shooting indiscriminately at staffers and others standing in line to talk to the congresswoman, said Mark Kimball, a communications staffer for Giffords.

"He was not more than three or four feet from the congresswoman and the district director," he said, describing the scene as "just complete chaos, people screaming, crying."

The shooting cast a pall over the Capitol as politicians of all stripes denounced the attack as a horrific. Capitol police asked members of Congress to be more vigilant about security in the wake of the shooting. Obama dispatched his FBI chief to Arizona.

Giffords, known as "Gabby," tweeted shortly before the shooting, describing her "Congress on Your Corner" event: "My 1st Congress on Your Corner starts now. Please stop by to let me know what is on your mind or tweet me later."

"It's not surprising that today Gabby was doing what she always does, listening to the hopes and concerns of her neighbors," Obama said. "That is the essence of what our democracy is about. That is why this is more than a tragedy for those involved. It is a tragedy for Arizona and a tragedy for our entire country."

Doctors were optimistic about Giffords surviving as she was responding to commands from doctors. "With guarded optimism, I hope she will survive, but this is a very devastating wound," said Dr. Richard Carmona, the former surgeon general who lives in Tucson.

Giffords spokesman C.J. Karamargin said besides the aide Zimmerman, who was killed, two other Giffords staffers were shot but expected to survive. Zimmerman was a former social worker who served as Giffords' director of community outreach. Giffords had worked with the judge in the past to line up funding to build a new courthouse in Yuma, and Obama hailed him for his nearly 40 years of service.

Greg Segalini, an uncle of Christina, the 9-year-old victim, told the Arizona Republic that a neighbor was going to the event and invited her along because she had just been elected to the student council and was interested in government.

Christina, who was born on Sept. 11, 2001, was involved in many activities, from ballet to baseball. She had just received her first Holy Communion at St. Odilia's Catholic Church on in Tucson, Catholic Diocese of Tucson officials told The Arizona Daily Star.

In the evening, more than 100 people attended a candlelight vigil outside Giffords' headquarters, where authorities investigated a suspicious package that turned out to be non-explosive.

The suspect Loughner was described by a former classmate as a pot-smoking loner, and the Army said he tried to enlist in December 2008 but was rejected for reasons not disclosed.

Federal law enforcement officials were poring over versions of a MySpace page that included a mysterious "Goodbye friends" message published hours before the shooting and exhorted his friends to "Please don't be mad at me."

In one of several Youtube videos, which featured text against a dark background, Loughner described inventing a new U.S. currency and complained about the illiteracy rate among people living in Giffords' congressional district in Arizona.

"I know who's listening: Government Officials, and the People," Loughner wrote. "Nearly all the people, who don't know this accurate information of a new currency, aren't aware of mind control and brainwash methods. If I have my civil rights, then this message wouldn't have happen (sic)."

In Loughner's middle-class neighborhood - about a five-minute drive from the scene - sheriff's deputies had much of the street blocked off. The neighborhood sits just off a bustling Tucson street and is lined with desert landscaping and palm trees.

Neighbors said Loughner lived with his parents and kept to himself. He was often seen walking his dog, almost always wearing a hooded sweat shirt and listening to his iPod.

Loughner's MySpace profile indicates he attended and graduated from school in Tucson and had taken college classes. He did not say if he was employed.

"We're getting out of here. We are freaked out," 33-year-old David Cleveland, who lives a few doors down from Loughner's house, told The Associated Press.

Cleveland said he was taking his wife and children, ages 5 and 7, to her parent's home when they heard about the shooting.

"When we heard about it, we just got sick to our stomachs," Cleveland said. "We just wanted to hold our kids tight."

High school classmate Grant Wiens, 22, said Loughner seemed to be "floating through life" and "doing his own thing."

"Sometimes religion was brought up or drugs. He smoked pot, I don't know how regularly. And he wasn't too keen on religion, from what I could tell," Wiens said.

Lynda Sorenson said she took a math class with Loughner last summer at Pima Community College's Northwest campus and told the Arizona Daily Star he was "obviously very disturbed." "He disrupted class frequently with nonsensical outbursts," she said.

In October 2007, Loughner was cited in Pima County for possession of drug paraphernalia, which was dismissed after he completed a diversion program, according to online records.

"He has kind of a troubled past, I can tell you that," Dupnik said.

Giffords was first elected to Congress amid a wave of Democratic victories in the 2006 election, and has been mentioned as a possible Senate candidate in 2012 and a gubernatorial prospect in 2014.

She is married to astronaut Mark E. Kelly, who has piloted space shuttles Endeavour and Discovery. The two met in China in 2003 while they were serving on a committee there, and were married in January 2007. Sen. Bill Nelson, chairman of the Senate Commerce Space and Science Subcommittee, said Kelly is training to be the next commander of the space shuttle mission slated for April. His brother is currently serving aboard the International Space Station, Nelson said.

Giffords is known in her southern Arizona district for her numerous public outreach meetings, which she acknowledged in an October interview with The Associated Press can sometimes be challenging.

"You know, the crazies on all sides, the people who come out, the planet earth people," she said with a following an appearance with Adm. Mike Mullen in which the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff was peppered with bizarre questions from an audience member. "I'm glad this just doesn't happen to me."

Now here are two blog reactions. This is the writing and analysis level you should be aiming for.
By Howard Fineman, senior political editor
WASHINGTON -- We don't yet know the extent to which the Tucson murders were about politics per se, though the alleged killer apparently did deliberately target a member of Congress. But violent national tragedies such as this one can profoundly affect the temper of the times--and the fate of the presidents who are in office when they happen.

The most vivid and obvious occurred almost a decade ago, when Al Qaeda attacked on September 11, 2001. President George W. Bush, his presidency until that point largely adrift, spoke amid the rubble of the World Trade Center four days later.

He made many mistakes thereafter. We are living with the consequences of them. But it is hard not to conclude that his bullhorn moment in New York--capturing Bush at his ardent best--all but insured his re-election three years later.

Bill Clinton had an analogous moment. In the spring of 1995, he was being widely dismissed as a political irrelevancy. Newt Gingrich had swept into power with an anti-federal agenda that dominated Washington.

But then, on April 19 of that year, Timothy McVeigh blew up the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, killing 168, including 19 children under the age of six. Horrifyingly vivid pictures of infants being carried from the rubble were broadcast worldwide.

Clinton's political resurrection began four days later. It had nothing to do with McVeigh, a former soldier who had taken a murderous turn from anti-authoritarianism to racist paranoia. The president was careful, as well he should have been, to avoid suggesting any link between his political foes and the event.

Rather, in a short but eloquent address--now regarded as a classic of modern presidential rhetoric--he recalled his own roots in nearby Arkansas, invoked God and the Bible, and called not only for justice but also for tolerance, forbearance and love.
Second blog example. This is by Gary Hart, Scholar in Residence at the University of Colorado.
Gradually, over time, political rhetoric used by politicians and the media has become more inflamatory. The degree to which violent words and phrases are considered commonplace is striking. Candidates are "targeted". An opponent is "in the crosshairs". Liberals have to be
"eliminated". Opponents are "enemies". This kind of language eminates largely from those who claim to defend American democracy against those who would destroy it, who are evil, and who want to "take away our freedoms".

Today we have seen the results of this rhetoric. Those with a megaphone, whether provided by public office or a media outlet, have responsibilities. They cannot avoid the consequences of their blatant efforts to inflame, anger, and outrage. We all know that there are unstable and potentially dangerous people among us. To repeatedly appeal to their basest instincts is to invite and welcome their predictable violence.

So long as we all tolerate this kind of irresponsible and dangerous rhetoric or, in the case of some commentators, treat it with delight, reward it, and consider it cute, so long will we place all those in public life, whom the provocateurs dislike, in the crosshairs of danger.

That this is carried out, and often rewarded, in the name of the Constitution, democratic rights and liberties, and patriotism is a mockery of all this nation claims to believe and almost all of us continue to struggle to preserve. America is better than this.

Grading: For each article and response of a minimum of 100 words, you receive 100 points. New articles will be posted every other day. Make sure that you have identified yourself clearly on the blog, so that you receive the appropriate credit. As this is on line, you won't have any difficulties completing this whether you are in class.

News Grammar update: This Friday you will receive the news grammar 3 (the last one). This, along with the previous 2, will constitute a test on Friday 21 January. I am simply taking excerpts from the 3, to which you already have the answers; so everyone should do very well. That will be your last grade of this marking period.

Wednesday, January 5, 2011


Obituaries are due at the close of class today.
Crime terms quiz is tomorrow.
I'll also hand out the next newsgrammar tomorrow.

Wednesday January 5 reminders


Your obituaries are due tomorrow at the close of class; any received after that time are 10 points off per day.
Don't forget that on Friday you have your crime vocabulary quiz.

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

Tuesday January 4 reflection essay

Continue to work on your obituaries, making sure to have read the two models. Quiz Friday on crime terms.